Top
SCIENCE. STORIES. IMPACT.

iBiology

Bringing the World's Best Biology to You

The Most Beautiful Experiment: Meselson and Stahl

00:00:19:21 John Cairns said on the telephone in a very excited voice,
00:00:22:24 he had just read Mendel's papers
00:00:27:04 [Imitating Cairns] "and you know they are the most beautiful
00:00:29:22 experiments in Biology."
00:00:32:04 And I gasped and I said, "John, John, you can't say that."
00:00:37:10 You said the Meselson-Stahl experiment
00:00:40:18 was the most beautiful experiment in Biology.
00:00:44:02 [Imitating Cairns] "Oh, did I?
00:00:46:12 Well, I was wrong."
00:00:53:22 Watson and Crick didn't make a discovery.
00:00:56:15 They proposed a model.
00:00:59:05 There are those who believed this model must be true
00:01:01:21 because it was so beautiful.
00:01:04:02 And there were those who believed it must be wrong
00:01:06:18 because biology is complicated.
00:01:09:02 And this model is too simple to be right.
00:01:12:01 Would you say?
00:01:13:05 Exactly, yes,
00:01:14:14 But there was no experimental proof of it.
00:01:17:01 They had a model which made a distinct prediction
00:01:20:18 about how DNA replicates and it needed to be tested.
00:01:24:11 And it's fun to test the hypothesis.
00:01:29:03 We agreed that we were going to work together
00:01:32:08 to figure out whether or not it was right.
00:01:38:23 When Frank and I showed semi-conservative replication,
00:01:43:03 It wasn't just a model, it was something real like that.
00:01:47:08 After our experiment,
00:01:48:18 it was now widely accepted that their model,
00:01:52:06 Watson-Crick model is right.
00:01:54:19 So it became the building block.
00:01:58:00 You might say for all of biology.
00:02:00:00 Yeah.
00:02:04:05 From very early childhood, I mean, practically infancy.
00:02:07:21 I loved science.
00:02:08:22 I loved to put wires together to make little radios,
00:02:13:24 which I could put under my pillow.
00:02:15:11 So my parents wouldn't know that I was listening
00:02:17:24 to them all night long.
00:02:19:21 And then I was very interested to know what makes life work.
00:02:24:08 And there had been, I think, in the house,
00:02:29:22 maybe even in my bedroom, that painting by Michelangelo,
00:02:36:02 God up high and Adam below and they're touching fingers.
00:02:42:11 I don't know if there is a spark.
00:02:45:08 I don't think there's a spark in the picture,
00:02:47:04 but I'm not sure.
00:02:48:15 But to me that meant that life is somehow electrical.
00:02:53:10 God is providing life through a spark.
00:02:57:14 And for some reason that made me interested in
00:02:59:12 electrochemistry.
00:03:01:19 Unlike Matthew,
00:03:02:20 I had no particularly strong interest in science as a youth.
00:03:09:11 What was understood that when I graduated from high school,
00:03:14:02 I would apply to the Naval Academy.
00:03:17:01 That's what my mother had in mind because she thought
00:03:19:09 I would look good in dress whites.
00:03:22:08 But then of course, World War II broke out.
00:03:25:01 So that plan changed fast and she decided
00:03:28:13 I should just go to college.
00:03:30:19 I think I was just too young to understand
00:03:33:13 the courses in humanities.
00:03:35:03 I hadn't had enough life experience to get a grip
00:03:38:23 on the questions they were even thinking about.
00:03:41:23 Science on the other hand was concrete.
00:03:44:17 Children can grasp science and among the sciences,
00:03:50:05 biology was the most appealing.
00:03:52:09 There, the fun was that you could figure out puzzles.
00:03:56:24 That is, there was a rational, concrete,
00:03:59:09 quantitative explanation for what you saw.
00:04:03:03 You could reason backwards as to what must be going on.
00:04:07:10 And that intrigued me enough to know that genetics
00:04:10:14 was something perhaps I could do.
00:04:20:19 I had the great, good luck to become Linus Pauling's
00:04:23:21 last graduate student.
00:04:25:09 His daughter was having a party at their swimming pool
00:04:28:12 and I'm in the water.
00:04:29:09 And Pauling comes out, the world's greatest chemist.
00:04:32:16 I'm all naked, practically, in a bathing suit.
00:04:36:13 And he's all dressed up with a jacket and a vest
00:04:40:04 and a neck tie.
00:04:41:11 And he looked down at me,
00:04:42:09 "Well, Matt, what are you gonna do next year?"
00:04:45:00 And I had already signed up
00:04:46:02 to go to the committee on mathematical biophysics
00:04:52:02 and Linus just looked down at me and he said,
00:04:54:00 "But Matt, that's a lot of baloney.
00:04:56:04 Come be my graduate student."
00:04:58:13 And so if I hadn't taken his course
00:05:00:19 on the nature of the chemical bond,
00:05:03:01 I would have had a very different life.
00:05:04:14 I wouldn't have met Frank,
00:05:06:19 I wouldn't be sitting here, that's for sure.
00:05:10:02 At the end of my PhD exam,
00:05:12:12 as we were walking out of the little exam room,
00:05:14:10 Linus Pauling turned to me and he said,
00:05:16:03 "Matt, you're very lucky you're entering this field
00:05:18:13 just at the right moment."
00:05:19:19 Yeah.
00:05:20:15 At the very beginning.
00:05:22:20 (upbeat music)
00:05:28:13 The first year of my being a graduate student at Caltech,
00:05:31:19 I wanted to get into biology.
00:05:33:17 I was a chemist and I thought the way to do that
00:05:36:12 would be to study molecular structure.
00:05:39:16 The only person who was looking at biology
00:05:42:01 from that point of view, other than Linus Pauling himself
00:05:45:10 was Max Delbruck.
00:05:47:03 He had a fearsome reputation.
00:05:49:13 Nevertheless, I got up my courage and went to see him.
00:05:52:10 He's not a fearsome creature at all really.
00:05:54:11 And the first thing he said was,
00:05:56:15 what do you think about these two papers
00:05:58:12 from Watson and Crick?
00:06:00:11 I said, I'd never heard of them.
00:06:03:01 I was still in the dark ages,
00:06:05:22 and he yelled at me.
00:06:07:08 He said, "Get out
00:06:08:04 and don't come back till you've read them."
00:06:13:12 There were two separate ideas that came together.
00:06:16:07 Crick's idea about how the base pairs linked onto the chains
00:06:21:22 and Jim's idea about how the base pairs were structured.
00:06:26:16 So there are four different building blocks in DNA,
00:06:29:07 adenine, thymine, guanine, and cytosine.
00:06:31:19 The surfaces of the G and the C are complementary
00:06:35:13 to each other and of the A and T are complementary
00:06:39:08 to each other so that they can fit together.
00:06:43:05 The way fingers would fit into a glove.
00:06:46:04 And importantly, when they put G opposite C,
00:06:50:21 the distance of the outside was exactly the same
00:06:55:07 as if they'd put A opposite T.
00:06:58:09 No other combination would give such a regular structure.
00:07:02:03 It was a gorgeous insight.
00:07:05:21 And then from that,
00:07:07:01 they made a hypothesis about how DNA is replicated.
00:07:11:02 It involved the two chains coming apart
00:07:15:12 and each one acting as a template for the synthesis
00:07:20:07 of a new chain on its surface.
00:07:24:12 When it's all done, here we have the two old chains,
00:07:27:24 each one now associated with a brand new chain.
00:07:32:08 What Watson and Crick proposed
00:07:34:07 was enormous stimulus to experimentation.
00:07:37:24 It was irresistibly beautiful.
00:07:39:21 Irresistibly beautiful.
00:07:42:22 Jim Watson was at Caltech the year after
00:07:46:19 he and Francis published their papers.
00:07:49:24 And so I got a chance to talk a lot with Jim then,
00:07:53:12 and that coming summer he was going to go
00:07:56:00 and teach the physiology course at Woods Hole.
00:08:01:16 I was a graduate student at Rochester at the time.
00:08:05:06 My chairman of the department who was also on my committee,
00:08:09:05 said I had to take a course in physiology.
00:08:12:18 And I said, the physiologist teacher here is a jerk.
00:08:15:13 I'll be damned if I'll take his course.
00:08:17:19 Well, send him to Woods Hole
00:08:19:23 to take the physiology course there.
00:08:22:16 And by serendipity, Jim Watson happened to be there
00:08:25:19 with some kid named Meselson hanging along with him.
00:08:29:19 We found that we had in fact deep, common interests.
00:08:33:22 I realized this is a guy who's really very smart
00:08:36:18 and I can learn a lot from him.
00:08:38:15 I remember a haze of beach parties,
00:08:42:03 lectures that I slept through
00:08:45:08 Well it was a kind of paradise.
00:08:48:04 The most interesting people in molecular biology.
00:08:51:08 Most of them were there.
00:08:52:22 So that's how we met.
00:08:54:10 And then it turns out Frank is coming that very September
00:08:57:07 to Caltech.
00:08:58:14 It would be a year from then I would come.
00:09:00:06 Are you sure?
00:09:01:03 Yep.
00:09:02:07 I still hadn't finished my thesis-
00:09:03:03 So I had to wait for a whole year before I saw you again?
00:09:05:18 That's right.
00:09:06:14 He said, when you get to Caltech we'll test Jim's idea.
00:09:11:13 What do you think about testing Jim's idea
00:09:13:22 of how DNA replicates?
00:09:15:19 And then he explained that to me,
00:09:17:21 I'd already heard about it and he explained it to me
00:09:20:23 and I absolutely - I committed, totally.
00:09:24:11 And then when Frank finally got there
00:09:26:22 and I wanted to start right away, he forbade it.
00:09:30:17 Why?
00:09:31:14 He said it would be bad for my character
00:09:34:06 to not complete my x-ray crystallography
00:09:37:09 before starting something new.
00:09:40:17 This tells you a lot about Frank's character.
00:09:46:18 With the Watson and Crick model,
00:09:48:16 the underlying question of course was,
00:09:50:23 was that really the right mechanism?
00:09:53:00 The famous Max Delbruck said no, no, no, no,
00:09:56:19 that model can't be right.
00:09:57:19 And he proposed a different model.
00:10:00:03 As Delbruck put it forth,
00:10:02:01 breaks are introduced in the parental molecule
00:10:05:14 as it's being replicated
00:10:07:13 and then carefully sealed up in certain ways.
00:10:10:16 Others proposed one in which
00:10:12:12 the original DNA molecule stays intact.
00:10:16:01 And the new DNA molecule is made of all new DNA.
00:10:21:14 So there were three targets out there
00:10:24:18 that in principle could be distinguished,
00:10:27:00 if you could trace the fate of the old chains,
00:10:30:11 what becomes of the two old chains.
00:10:32:16 And one step led to the next, really.
00:10:35:09 I mean, the first idea was using density somehow,
00:10:39:10 which is not a very good idea yet,
00:10:41:07 except it leads you to the next one.
00:10:43:03 Matt's idea from the very beginning
00:10:45:10 was that somehow stable isotopes could be used.
00:10:50:01 That would be incorporated into the DNA
00:10:53:02 and impart upon the DNA, a different density.
00:10:56:10 You grow bacteria in a medium,
00:10:59:03 which instead of having this ordinary isotope of nitrogen
00:11:03:11 N14, you can buy nitrogen 15 ammonium chloride,
00:11:09:24 the heavy kind.
00:11:12:11 And if you grow the bacteria for a number of generations,
00:11:15:13 you can be sure that essentially all of the DNA
00:11:19:12 is labeled with heavy nitrogen, good.
00:11:23:08 Now, we resuspend those cells in a medium that just has
00:11:26:13 ordinary, nitrogen 14, the light one.
00:11:30:12 And now the question is as the DNA molecules replicate,
00:11:34:23 how will the heavy nitrogen from those parent molecules
00:11:39:04 be distributed amongst the daughter molecules
00:11:42:19 that are produced in successive duplications?
00:11:46:13 Then some sensitive method for separating DNA,
00:11:50:24 according to its density would be devised.
00:11:54:18 I ran across an article about the centrifugation
00:11:58:06 of cesium chloride solution
00:11:59:24 to measure the molecular weight.
00:12:02:01 If the DNA was in there with the cesium,
00:12:05:17 it would find its position in the density gradient.
00:12:09:07 If it was heavy DNA,
00:12:11:15 it would tend to be down near the bottom of the tube
00:12:14:02 where the cesium was concentrated and the density was high.
00:12:18:14 If the DNA was light DNA, made of light isotopes,
00:12:22:18 it would be higher up in the tube.
00:12:29:00 You could think about it this way.
00:12:30:21 If you jumped into the Great Salt Lake,
00:12:32:21 as we all know you float,
00:12:34:15 you go right to the top because you are less dense
00:12:38:00 than the water.
00:12:38:21 But if you have a bathing suit with pockets in it,
00:12:41:10 and you stuffed some lead weights in your pockets,
00:12:44:22 you'll sink down.
00:12:46:05 Cause you're more dense than the water.
00:12:48:22 Now imagine that the salt in the Great Salt Lake
00:12:51:22 is not uniformly distributed,
00:12:54:09 but is concentrated near the bottom
00:12:57:12 and rather less concentrated near the top.
00:13:01:12 Now, if you put just the right number of heavy weights
00:13:04:13 in your pocket, you won't float because you'll be too dense.
00:13:09:05 You won't float at the top and you won't go all the way
00:13:11:13 to the bottom because you're not dense enough.
00:13:14:03 You'll instead come to rest somewhere,
00:13:16:13 halfway between the top and the bottom,
00:13:19:01 you will have found your place in that gradient.
00:13:23:17 And that's the very basis by which the experiment
00:13:26:12 finally worked and worked so beautifully.
00:13:29:01 And then it was just a question of looking
00:13:30:22 in the centrifuge while it's running.
00:13:33:24 And when it reaches equilibrium to see where
00:13:37:07 the heavy and light DNA are.
00:13:39:02 All the makings were there,
00:13:40:13 then to do the experiment itself,
00:13:42:21 it was obvious that the experiment was going
00:13:45:08 to give an answer.
00:13:46:23 Driving it all was the fact that Frank
00:13:49:14 wanted to know how life works.
00:13:57:12 Yeah, yeah.
00:14:01:14 [Mumbles]
00:14:04:09 I don't know that drove it all but-
00:14:07:14 Each person is trying to come up with something
00:14:09:21 as a gift to the other guy.
00:14:12:02 That's true.
00:14:12:23 I think
00:14:13:19 That's true
00:14:14:15 So it becomes a very connected
00:14:17:02 relationship because the next day you want
00:14:20:12 to have something to offer.
00:14:23:09 Matt was ready to step out into an area,
00:14:26:22 pretty heavily uncharted,
00:14:29:23 to answer an important question.
00:14:32:08 And the pieces had to be built as he went along.
00:14:36:15 (upbeat music)
00:14:40:18 The prediction of the Watson and Crick model,
00:14:43:04 was the two parent chains come apart.
00:14:45:00 Each one makes a new daughter molecule
00:14:47:01 and that's replication.
00:14:48:16 So that would predict that after exactly one generation,
00:14:52:16 when everything has doubled in the bacterial culture,
00:14:56:02 that you'd find the DNA molecules all have one old strand,
00:15:01:12 which is labeled heavy.
00:15:03:01 And one new strand,
00:15:05:01 which is labeled light and therefore their density
00:15:08:01 should be halfway between fully heavy and fully light,
00:15:12:06 that would be the prediction for what you see
00:15:15:07 at exactly one generation.
00:15:17:08 What do you predict to see for the next generation?
00:15:20:17 Well, each molecule would, again, separate its chains.
00:15:24:08 One of which is heavy.
00:15:26:00 The other of which is light and the only
00:15:28:14 growth medium available is light growth medium.
00:15:32:08 Then the light chain would make another light chain
00:15:35:04 to go with it, a complement.
00:15:37:05 The heavy chain would make another,
00:15:39:15 a light chain to go with it.
00:15:42:00 So after two generations you have DNA,
00:15:45:11 half of which is half heavy.
00:15:47:13 And the other half of which is all light
00:15:53:13 And fantastically,
00:15:55:05 that's exactly the result that one could see.
00:16:02:24 In order to say that the Watson-Crick model
00:16:06:08 fits the data very well, but the other two models do not,
00:16:10:14 we have to see what they'd predict.
00:16:12:23 Start with the Dispersive Model.
00:16:15:10 After one generation,
00:16:17:02 the two molecules resulting would indeed be half heavy,
00:16:21:10 but in the next generation,
00:16:23:10 there would be a subsequent dispersion of the label.
00:16:26:18 So you'd be getting molecules that were
00:16:29:20 three quarters light, and one quarter heavy.
00:16:34:22 And in each generation,
00:16:36:10 the molecules would get lighter and lighter.
00:16:39:16 The fully Conservative Model simply imagined that duplex DNA
00:16:44:16 fully heavy now, somehow created the appearance of a fully
00:16:51:09 light duplex molecule in which both chains
00:16:54:07 are made of light DNA.
00:16:59:15 Most of the times when you get an experimental result,
00:17:03:19 it doesn't speak to you with such clarity.
00:17:07:19 These pictures of the DNA bands interpreted themselves.
00:17:18:14 It felt like a...supernatural.
00:17:21:22 It felt like you were in touch with the gods
00:17:24:10 or something like that.
00:17:25:16 I remember I presented this result that summer
00:17:29:16 early in the summer in France at a phage meeting,
00:17:33:23 complete with the photographs
00:17:36:02 of the density gradient bandings.
00:17:39:05 And at the end of it,
00:17:41:17 I stopped and there was total silence and somebody said,
00:17:45:16 "Well, that's it."
00:17:53:21 The intellectual freedom at Caltech.
00:17:56:02 We could do whatever we wanted.
00:17:58:00 It was very unusual for such young guys
00:18:00:19 to do such an important experiment.
00:18:02:23 So suddenly, whereas before that,
00:18:05:12 like Max would be talking with Sinsheimer
00:18:08:00 about the genetic code.
00:18:09:23 And before we did our experiment,
00:18:11:10 I was definitely not - at least
00:18:13:11 I felt I wasn't - supposed to be at those discussions.
00:18:16:15 But afterwards, I could be a full member.
00:18:20:06 We had this wonderful house,
00:18:21:15 big house across the street from the lab. And our roommates,
00:18:26:19 we all,
00:18:27:15 we talked about these experiments at almost every dinner.
00:18:31:01 So we had this wonderful intellectual atmosphere,
00:18:35:11 John Drake, Howard Temin.
00:18:38:00 Why are you frowning?
00:18:39:06 He told the dirtiest jokes I've ever heard.
00:18:41:04 No that was Roger Milkman.
00:18:42:20 [Crosstalk]
00:18:45:11 Positions one and two.
00:18:46:18 That's true, that's true, that's true.
00:18:49:05 So it was a very lively, intense, friendly atmosphere.
00:18:56:12 It was lively enough and conveniently located enough
00:19:00:12 that over time we had visits from William O. Douglas,
00:19:05:17 Judge Douglas.
00:19:06:13 Judge Douglas of the Supreme Court
00:19:08:11 And here Dick Feynman probably one of the world's greatest
00:19:13:13 physicists at that time,
00:19:15:04 or maybe ever, palled around with us.
00:19:17:17 He came over to our big house and played his drums,
00:19:22:00 sat down on the floor, played the drums.
00:19:24:21 I'm just a graduate student
00:19:26:03 and he's the world's greatest physicist,
00:19:29:17 but that's what it was like.
00:19:30:22 It was a very friendly wide open place.
00:19:33:10 Frank and I are very lucky.
00:19:36:20 The way I think of it is that there's a river,
00:19:39:17 which is a period of time when the fundamental things,
00:19:42:21 the structure of DNA, how replication happens,
00:19:45:10 the genetic code.
00:19:47:06 And then, when these problems are solved.
00:19:50:22 There are lots of little rivulets.
00:19:51:18 The river divides into thousands of branches
00:19:55:16 using these fundamental insights into how life works
00:20:00:16 and applying them to specific questions,
00:20:03:14 questions of disease etc.
00:20:07:09 So to me, with some exceptions,
00:20:11:21 this was a really interesting time
00:20:14:00 when it was still a big river.
00:20:16:04 Also, now you can cut this out,
00:20:19:04 but also the Meselsons, Matt's parents, were kind enough to
00:20:22:14 keep the liquor cabinet fully stocked at all times.
00:20:29:22 (upbeat music)
00:20:49:15 My throat is a little bit?
00:20:51:22 I have a cough drop
00:20:54:06 (whispering) I don't want a cough drop. I want a non-alcoholic beer.
00:20:58:21 I require a margarita.
00:21:00:22 I've worked for the CIA.
00:21:04:08 I vaporized many people, including many of your friends,
00:21:08:16 Big black beard,
00:21:09:19 and blew out some of his pipe smoke and still
00:21:12:20 holding his pipe stem in his teeth said,
00:21:15:01 "Oh Matt history is just what people think it was."

This Talk
Speakers: Frank Stahl, Matthew Meselson
Audience:
  • General Public
  • Educators of H. School / Intro Undergrad
  • Student
Recorded: February 2020
More Talks in DNA Replication and Repair
All Talks in DNA Replication and Repair

Talk Overview

Matt Meselson and Frank Stahl were in their mid-20s when they performed what is now recognized as one of the most beautiful experiments in modern biology. In this short film, Matt and Frank share how they devised the groundbreaking experiment that proved semiconservative DNA replication, what it was like to see the results for the first time, and how it felt to be at the forefront of molecular biology research in the 1950s. This film celebrates a lifelong friendship, a shared love of science, and the serendipity that can lead to foundational discoveries about the living world.

Please head to the Science Communication Lab’s website for more films like this along with educator resources, full video transcript, and most up to date content.

View Educator Resources & Transcript on SCL Website →
More Famous Discoveries Films →

Speaker Bio

Frank Stahl

Frank Stahl

Frank Stahl received his PhD at the University of Rochester, where he studied genetic recombination in phage. He performed postdoctoral studies at Caltech, during which he completed the famous Meselson-Stahl experiment, and joined the faculty at the University of Oregon in Eugene in 1959. He is now an emeritus faculty member who enjoys teaching and… Continue Reading

Matthew Meselson

Matthew Meselson

Dr. Meselson has made important contributions to the areas of DNA replication, repair and recombination as well as isolating the first restriction enzyme. Currently, he is Professor of Molecular and Cellular Biology at Harvard University, where his lab studies aging in the model organism bdelloid rotifers. Meselson is also a long-time advocate for the abolition… Continue Reading

More Talks in Genetics and Gene Regulation

Related Resources

Meselson M. and Stahl F. The replication of DNA in Escherichia coli. PNAS July 15, 1958 44 (7) 671-682.

Teaching resources from XBio: How DNA Replicates

Credits

Sarah Goodwin (Wonder Collaborative): Executive Producer
Elliot Kirschner (Wonder Collaborative): Executive Producer
Shannon Behrman (iBiology): Executive Producer
Brittany Anderton (iBiology): Producer
Derek Reich (ZooPrax Productions): Videographer
Eric Kornblum (iBiology): Videographer
Rebecca Ellsworth (The Edit Center): Editor
Adam Bolt (The Edit Center): Editor
Gb Kim (Explorer’s Guide to Biology): Illustrations
Chris George: Design and Graphics
Maggie Hubbard: Design and Graphics
Marcus Bagala: Original music
Samuel Bagala: Original music

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. ANGELA DIXON says

    Thank you – I cannot tell you how much I enjoyed this video. It was as if I was sitting in Dr. Stahl’s living room, having a conversation with these two great scientists. What an elegant experiment! You have really captured the essence of two incredible scientists in this video.

    Reply

  2. Marieke Mackintosh says

    Thank you for sharing this incredible footage of these brilliant human beings. What a joy it is to watch them reminisce and teach. I cannot wait to show this to my students.

    Reply

  3. Neeraja Sankaran says

    Hi.. this is not a comment except to say that this is a beautiful video. Could you give me the full citation please, I’d like to include it in a bibliography

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

iBiology and iBiology Courses are part of the Science Communication Lab (SCL). Our mission remains the same, to connect people to science. However, our focus has shifted to producing and evaluating cinematic films for education and the public, which you can find on the Science Communication Lab website. For more information, please see this blog post!